XM tidak memberikan layanan kepada penduduk Amerika Serikat.

China-EU trade Plan B looks too fiddly



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>BREAKINGVIEWS-China-EU trade Plan B looks too fiddly</title></head><body>

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own. Updates to add graphic.

By Katrina Hamlin

HONG KONG, Nov 6 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Beijing and Brussels are once again debating duties on imported Chinese electric cars. The People’s Republic is pushing for alternatives to tariffs, which were finalised by the European Commission just last week. But their potential Plan B looks unwieldy, and could undermine local manufacturing.

The European Union is ready to negotiate. If talks progress, made-in-China EVs, or a portion of those exports, could be subject to minimum prices rather than levies. This could be preferable for BYD 002594.SZ, 1211.HK, Geely 0175.HK and peers. While the new tariffs ranging from 7.8% for Tesla TSLA.O to 35% for SAIC 600104.SS put a chunky dent in carmakers’ margins, a minimum selling price might do less damage if it effectively allowed Chinese vehicles to be sold at similar levels to locally made marques.

From the EU’s point of view, this could help legacy European brands compete, and shows a willingness to work with an increasingly important trade partner. A cordial relationship with China would make it easier for the two sides to protect access to a key market and would be especially valuable to Beijing if Sino-American relations continue to deteriorate under the next U.S. president.

But deciding where to set the floor price is difficult. Using this mechanism to standardise rates for a measure of raspberries or paperclips is easy enough, less so for highly engineered machines with varying specifications.

Even if watchdogs do manage to design a system all parties agree on, enforcement would be challenging. It’s not just checking dealerships across 27 countries. In China, carmakers embroiled in competitive discounting often throw in extras – freebies like software subscriptions and accessories alter the value proposition. Another downside for Brussels is that carmakers may delay or decline to build European production lines, since those investments make more sense in a scenario where they otherwise face hefty levies.

For now, drawn-out deliberations complicate these companies’ future in Europe. China asked carmakers to halt investments in EU member states supporting tariffs, Reuters reported last week, citing sources. Even before that, some had pressed pause: $28 billion Great Wall Motor 601633.SS said in May it would close its European headquarters in Germany, citing “numerous uncertainties”. Battery affiliate SVOLT is shuttering operations there too, the Nikkei reports, citing a source. The sooner Brussels and Beijing agree on the road ahead, the better.

Follow @KatrinaHamlin on X

CONTEXT NEWS

China's commerce ministry on Nov. 1 confirmed that the European Union will send representatives to the country for negotiations regarding price commitments in the electric-vehicle tariff dispute.

On Oct. 29, the European Commission concluded its anti-subsidy investigation into Chinese electric car imports and imposed additional duties of up to 35.3%.

In a statement, the Commission noted that the EU and China would continue to seek alternative approaches to address the bloc’s concerns, and that it remained open to negotiating “price undertakings” with individual exporters.


Graphic: Chinese EV brands lose market share in Europe https://reut.rs/40ASQIl


Editing by Una Galani and Ujjaini Dutta

</body></html>

Pengungkapan: Entitas XM Group menyediakan layanan khusus eksekusi dan akses ke Fasilitas Trading Online kami, yang memungkinkan Anda untuk melihat dan/atau menggunakan konten yang tersedia pada atau melalui situs, yang tidak untuk mengubah atau memperluas, serta tidak mengubah atau memperluas hal tersebut. Akses dan penggunaan ini selalu sesuai dengan: (i) Syarat dan Ketentuan; (ii) Peringatan Risiko; dan (iii) Pengungkapan Penuh. Oleh karena itu, konten disediakan hanya sebagai informasi umum. Anda juga harus ketahui bahwa konten Fasilitas Trading Online kami bukan sebagai ajakan atau tawaran untuk untuk melakukan transaksi apa pun di pasar finansial. Trading di pasar finansial mana pun melibatkan tingkat risiko yang signifikan pada modal Anda.

Semua materi yang diterbitkan di Fasilitas Trading Online kami hanya untuk tujuan edukasi/informasi dan tidak boleh mengandung nasihat dan rekomendasi finansial, pajak investasi atau trading, catatan harga trading kami, penawaran, permintaan, transaksi dalam instrumen finansial apa pun atau promo finansial untuk Anda yang tidak diminta.

Konten pihak ketiga apa pun, serta konten yang disiapkan oleh XM, seperti opini, berita, riset, analisis, harga, informasi lain atau link ke situs pihak ketiga yang tersedia "sebagaimana adanya", sebagai komentar pasar umum dan bukan menjadi nasihat investasi. Sejauh konten apa pun ditafsirkan sebagai penelitian investasi, Anda harus memperhatikan dan menerima bahwa konten tersebut tidak dimaksudkan dan belum disiapkan sesuai dengan persyaratan hukum yang dirancang untuk mempromosikan kemandirian riset investasi dan dengan demikian akan dianggap sebagai komunikasi pemasaran di bawah hukum dan peraturan yang relevan. Mohon dipastikan bahwa Anda telah membaca dan memahami Notifikasi pada Riset Investasi Non-Independen dan Peringatan Risiko kami mengenai informasi di atas, yang dapat diakses disini.

Peringatan Resiko: Modal Anda beresiko. Produk dengan leverage mungkin tidak cocok bagi semua orang. Silahkan pertimbangkan Pengungkapan Resiko kami.