Ex-bankruptcy judge plays defense on pre-deposition talks, phone records
By Dietrich Knauth
Aug 5 (Reuters) -Former U.S. bankruptcy judge David Jones in Houston, who is under increasing pressure in a battle over attorneys' fees that he approved for his romantic partner's former law firm, has been summoned to court to explain his recent "off the record" discussions with the firm.
Chief Bankruptcy Judge Eduardo Rodriguez said in a Saturday court order that Jones' informal meeting may have violated a judiciary policy that says that judges and court employees may not "comment, testify, or produce records" in a legal proceeding without prior approval.
Rodriguez ordered Jones to attend a Wednesday court hearing in Houston to explain, under threat of civil contempt sanctions, why his meeting with Jackson Walker did not violate judiciary policy or Rodriguez's recent court orders. If Jones does not show up on Wednesday, he faces further penalties including a bench warrant for his arrest.
Jones resigned from the bench in October 2023 after admitting to a long-term, undisclosed relationship with bankruptcy attorney Liz Freeman, who was a partner at Jackson Walker, which regularly filed cases in Jones' court. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found there was probable cause to believe Jones violated the codes of conduct that govern judges, but it ended its ethics inquiry when he resigned.
The U.S. Department of Justice's bankruptcy watchdog, the office of the U.S. Trustee, has argued that Jackson Walker should disgorge over $13 million in legal fees that Jones approved in 33 bankruptcy cases, and both Jackson Walker and the U.S. Trustee have sought to depose Jones to ask who else knew about his romantic relationship.
Rodriguez has previously expressed concern that some of Jackson Walker's deposition questions could run afoul of the judicial policy that prevents judges from testifying about their official acts, and he has not yet ruled on the scope of the depositions.
Jackson Walker declined to comment Monday. Attorneys for Jones did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Freeman, who left Jackson Walker in December 2022, declined to comment.
The U.S. Trustee informed Rodriguez about the meeting in a Friday court filing, and it said that it had turned down an offer for a similar "off the record" meeting with Jones.
Jones is separately attempting to fend off a subpoena from a bankruptcy trustee who wants records of telephone calls and text messages sent and received by Jones' government issued cell phone.
The trustee, who is overseeing the wind-down of JC Penney’s 2020 bankruptcy case, is investigating "an unsubstantiated rumor that Jones and counsel appearing before him would exchange texts, including during ongoing hearings." The trustee wants to know if Jones had any communications that negatively impacted JC Penney's bankruptcy, which ultimately resulted in a $1.75 billion sale to mall operators Simon Property Group and Brookfield Property Partners.
Jones said in a court filing Monday that the phone records subpoena must be quashed, because it is irrelevant to the dispute over whether or not Jackson Walker should return its legal fees. The subpoena also threatens to impede official court business, Jones argued.
"If federal judges cannot use court-issued technology with the absolute privilege of privacy, the independence of the federal judiciary itself is negatively affected," Jones' attorneys wrote.
Rodriguez will consider both Jones' meeting with Jackson Walker and the JC Penney trustee's demand for phone records at Wednesday's hearing.
The case is In Re: Professional Fee Matters Concerning the Jackson Walker Law Firm, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, No. 23-00645.
For Jones: Ben Finestone and Joanna Caytas of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
For Jackson Walker: Jason Boland of Norton Rose Fulbright
Read more:
Top US bankruptcy judge resigns amid ethics inquiry
Law firm says Texas judge wanted 'untruthful' statement about lawyer romance
Houston bankruptcy court resets two-judge panel for big cases
Reporting by Dietrich Knauth
Aset Terkait
Berita Terbaru
Pengungkapan: Entitas XM Group menyediakan layanan khusus eksekusi dan akses ke Fasilitas Trading Online kami, yang memungkinkan Anda untuk melihat dan/atau menggunakan konten yang tersedia pada atau melalui situs, yang tidak untuk mengubah atau memperluas, serta tidak mengubah atau memperluas hal tersebut. Akses dan penggunaan ini selalu sesuai dengan: (i) Syarat dan Ketentuan; (ii) Peringatan Risiko; dan (iii) Pengungkapan Penuh. Oleh karena itu, konten disediakan hanya sebagai informasi umum. Anda juga harus ketahui bahwa konten Fasilitas Trading Online kami bukan sebagai ajakan atau tawaran untuk untuk melakukan transaksi apa pun di pasar finansial. Trading di pasar finansial mana pun melibatkan tingkat risiko yang signifikan pada modal Anda.
Semua materi yang diterbitkan di Fasilitas Trading Online kami hanya untuk tujuan edukasi/informasi dan tidak boleh mengandung nasihat dan rekomendasi finansial, pajak investasi atau trading, catatan harga trading kami, penawaran, permintaan, transaksi dalam instrumen finansial apa pun atau promo finansial untuk Anda yang tidak diminta.
Konten pihak ketiga apa pun, serta konten yang disiapkan oleh XM, seperti opini, berita, riset, analisis, harga, informasi lain atau link ke situs pihak ketiga yang tersedia "sebagaimana adanya", sebagai komentar pasar umum dan bukan menjadi nasihat investasi. Sejauh konten apa pun ditafsirkan sebagai penelitian investasi, Anda harus memperhatikan dan menerima bahwa konten tersebut tidak dimaksudkan dan belum disiapkan sesuai dengan persyaratan hukum yang dirancang untuk mempromosikan kemandirian riset investasi dan dengan demikian akan dianggap sebagai komunikasi pemasaran di bawah hukum dan peraturan yang relevan. Mohon dipastikan bahwa Anda telah membaca dan memahami Notifikasi pada Riset Investasi Non-Independen dan Peringatan Risiko kami mengenai informasi di atas, yang dapat diakses disini.
