Lawyer who tipped SEC can't claim whistleblower award, US appeals court rules
By Mike Scarcella
Aug 16 (Reuters) -A corporate attorney who tipped off the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to possible fraud involving his company was properly denied eligibility to collect a whistleblower award, an appeals court said in a ruling unsealed on Friday.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said the attorney, who was not named, failed to meet SEC requirements for whistleblower information to be "original" and not derived from legal representation of a client.
There is a limited exception to the requirements under which lawyers could claim an SEC award if their disclosure was made in accordance with state professional attorney conduct rules and in a client's interest. The D.C. Circuit found the exception did not apply.
The three-judge panel upheld a commission order denying a cut of the unspecified award.
In a statement, attorneys for the unnamed lawyer said their client “did the right thing in blowing the whistle” and said he “put a stop to a massive securities fraud.”
The SEC declined to comment.
Much of the litigation was conducted under seal, shielding the names of the attorney and his company.
The D.C. Circuit said the underlying tip was related to a 2018 enforcement action in Florida against two individuals, the lawyer’s company and other entities. Sanctions levied by the SEC in the case totaled tens of millions of dollars.
Whistleblower awards for attorneys are available only in limited circumstances, the SEC told the appeals court.
The lawyer argued that he acted in his company's interest and provided information to the SEC to prevent it from committing a crime.
The D.C. Circuit disagreed.
“In reporting on the suspected wrongdoing, then, Doe was reporting on his own client,” the court said. “Common sense therefore dictates that Doe could not have reasonably believed that he was acting in his client’s best interest.”
The SEC’s whistleblower program as of last year had doled out nearly $2 billion in awards to about 400 whistleblowers since its creation in 2010, according to the agency.
The largest awards have been worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
The case is John Doe v. Securities and Exchange Commission, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 23-1044.
For Doe: Tom Cummins and Max Maccoby of Washington Global Law Group
For SEC: William Shirey of SEC
Read more:
Comcast sues US Labor Department to shut down whistleblower case, citing US Supreme Court
US Justice Dept. launches whistleblower program aimed at corporate crime
Why foreign workers are not shielded by federal whistleblower laws
Wall Street criminal enforcer urges whistleblowers to come forward
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Aset Terkait
Berita Terbaru
Pengungkapan: Entitas XM Group menyediakan layanan khusus eksekusi dan akses ke Fasilitas Trading Online kami, yang memungkinkan Anda untuk melihat dan/atau menggunakan konten yang tersedia pada atau melalui situs, yang tidak untuk mengubah atau memperluas, serta tidak mengubah atau memperluas hal tersebut. Akses dan penggunaan ini selalu sesuai dengan: (i) Syarat dan Ketentuan; (ii) Peringatan Risiko; dan (iii) Pengungkapan Penuh. Oleh karena itu, konten disediakan hanya sebagai informasi umum. Anda juga harus ketahui bahwa konten Fasilitas Trading Online kami bukan sebagai ajakan atau tawaran untuk untuk melakukan transaksi apa pun di pasar finansial. Trading di pasar finansial mana pun melibatkan tingkat risiko yang signifikan pada modal Anda.
Semua materi yang diterbitkan di Fasilitas Trading Online kami hanya untuk tujuan edukasi/informasi dan tidak boleh mengandung nasihat dan rekomendasi finansial, pajak investasi atau trading, catatan harga trading kami, penawaran, permintaan, transaksi dalam instrumen finansial apa pun atau promo finansial untuk Anda yang tidak diminta.
Konten pihak ketiga apa pun, serta konten yang disiapkan oleh XM, seperti opini, berita, riset, analisis, harga, informasi lain atau link ke situs pihak ketiga yang tersedia "sebagaimana adanya", sebagai komentar pasar umum dan bukan menjadi nasihat investasi. Sejauh konten apa pun ditafsirkan sebagai penelitian investasi, Anda harus memperhatikan dan menerima bahwa konten tersebut tidak dimaksudkan dan belum disiapkan sesuai dengan persyaratan hukum yang dirancang untuk mempromosikan kemandirian riset investasi dan dengan demikian akan dianggap sebagai komunikasi pemasaran di bawah hukum dan peraturan yang relevan. Mohon dipastikan bahwa Anda telah membaca dan memahami Notifikasi pada Riset Investasi Non-Independen dan Peringatan Risiko kami mengenai informasi di atas, yang dapat diakses disini.
