Litigation funder backs cases over NJ law shielding info on judges, officials
By Nate Raymond
Oct 11 (Reuters) -A data-deletion firm that has sued over 100 businesses accusing themof running afoul of a New Jersey law designed to shield the release of addresses and other personal information of judges, police and prosecutors is being backed by a third-party litigation funder, according to court papers.
Atlas Data Privacy, a software firm that has been assigned claims by over 19,000 people eligible for protection under the law, disclosed it expected to soon deploy funding provided by Parabellum Capital in a Thursdayfiling in New Jersey federal court.
The New York-based litigation funder, which has over $1 billion in assets under management, spun out of Credit Suisse in 2012 and provides third-party funding to litigants in commercial disputes in exchange for a share of any recovery.
In January, it said it closed on its third private fund with total investor commitments of $754 million.
Often funding arrangements between plaintiffs and third-party litigation funders go undisclosed. But New Jersey's federal court in 2021 adopted a unique rule requiring litigants to detail when they have such funding.
Atlas said that it was receiving non-resource financing that would be "collateralized by litigation proceeds." It did not provide details on the financial terms of the arrangement.
Parabellum CEO Howard Shams had no immediate comment. Atlas' lawyers at PEM Law, Boies Schiller Flexner and Morgan & Morgan did not respond to requests for comment.
The disclosure came a week after various companies sued by Atlas went before U.S. District Judge Harvey Bartle in Camden to argue that its lawsuits should be dismissed on the grounds that the New Jersey law knownas Daniel's Law violated the companies' free speech rights under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment.
The measure was signed into law in 2020 by Democratic Governor Phil Murphy in response to the fatal shooting of the 20-year-old son of U.S. District Judge Esther Salas at her New Jersey home by a disgruntled lawyer.
The law, which has since been expanded, allows current and former judges, law enforcement, prosecutors, and other officials to request that private entities not disclose their home addresses or unpublished home phone numbers.
Companies that do not comply with an official's request to not disclose their information can be sued for damages.
A similar federal law named after Salas' son, the Daniel Anderl Judicial Security and Privacy Act, was enacted by Congress in late 2022 and protects judges by shielding their personal information online.
Atlas launched a wave of lawsuits earlier this year on behalf of individuals covered by the law against real estate businesses, marketing companies, data brokers and credit reporting agencies. Defendants include CoStar Group, Oracle Corp, Zillow and Thomson Reuters, Reuters' parent company.
Thomson Reuters in a statement said it was aware of the litigation funding but was focused on addressing the merits of the case. It said Daniel's Law "attempts to serve a laudable goal" but in its current form violates the First Amendment.
Individuals who assigned claims to Atlas to pursue in court stand to receive 65% of any judgment it recovers, according to a court filing filed on Thursday. It has contingency-fee arrangements with its law firms, according to another filing.
The case is Atlas Data Privacy Corp v. LightBox Parent LP, et al, U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, No. 22-4105.
For Atlas Data Privacy Corp: Rajiv Parikh of PEM Law, Mark Mao of Boies Schiller Flexner and John Yanchunis of Morgan & Morgan
For LightBox, et al: Kevin McDonough of Latham & Watkins
For New Jersey: Daniel Vannella of the New Jersey Office of the Attorney General
Read more:
New Jersey defends privacy law shielding judges, prosecutors
US judicial panel to examine litigation finance disclosure
Litigation funders howl as N.J. adopts disclosure requirement
Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston
Aset Terkait
Berita Terbaru
Pengungkapan: Entitas XM Group menyediakan layanan khusus eksekusi dan akses ke Fasilitas Trading Online kami, yang memungkinkan Anda untuk melihat dan/atau menggunakan konten yang tersedia pada atau melalui situs, yang tidak untuk mengubah atau memperluas, serta tidak mengubah atau memperluas hal tersebut. Akses dan penggunaan ini selalu sesuai dengan: (i) Syarat dan Ketentuan; (ii) Peringatan Risiko; dan (iii) Pengungkapan Penuh. Oleh karena itu, konten disediakan hanya sebagai informasi umum. Anda juga harus ketahui bahwa konten Fasilitas Trading Online kami bukan sebagai ajakan atau tawaran untuk untuk melakukan transaksi apa pun di pasar finansial. Trading di pasar finansial mana pun melibatkan tingkat risiko yang signifikan pada modal Anda.
Semua materi yang diterbitkan di Fasilitas Trading Online kami hanya untuk tujuan edukasi/informasi dan tidak boleh mengandung nasihat dan rekomendasi finansial, pajak investasi atau trading, catatan harga trading kami, penawaran, permintaan, transaksi dalam instrumen finansial apa pun atau promo finansial untuk Anda yang tidak diminta.
Konten pihak ketiga apa pun, serta konten yang disiapkan oleh XM, seperti opini, berita, riset, analisis, harga, informasi lain atau link ke situs pihak ketiga yang tersedia "sebagaimana adanya", sebagai komentar pasar umum dan bukan menjadi nasihat investasi. Sejauh konten apa pun ditafsirkan sebagai penelitian investasi, Anda harus memperhatikan dan menerima bahwa konten tersebut tidak dimaksudkan dan belum disiapkan sesuai dengan persyaratan hukum yang dirancang untuk mempromosikan kemandirian riset investasi dan dengan demikian akan dianggap sebagai komunikasi pemasaran di bawah hukum dan peraturan yang relevan. Mohon dipastikan bahwa Anda telah membaca dan memahami Notifikasi pada Riset Investasi Non-Independen dan Peringatan Risiko kami mengenai informasi di atas, yang dapat diakses disini.
