Surging grocery prices in focus as US tries to stop Kroger deal
Recasts with surging grocery prices, adds details in paragraphs 1, 3 and 8-9
FTC and US states argue merger will harm competition and raise prices
Kroger and Albertsons claim merger needed to compete with Walmart, Amazon
Kroger pledges $1 billion in price cuts, plans to sell 579 stores if deal proceeds
By Deborah Bloom, Jody Godoy
PORTLAND, Oregon, Aug 26 (Reuters) -The U.S. Federal Trade Commission argued in federal court on Monday that Kroger's KR.N $25 billion merger with rival grocer Albertsons ACI.N is bad for shoppers in a case that highlights growing alarm over surging grocery prices.
The FTC and several states went to trial in Portland, Oregon, to block the deal, saying it would mean higher prices for consumers and less bargaining power for unionized grocery workers.
FTC Chief Trial Counsel Susan Musser told U.S. District Judge Adrienne Nelson during opening statements in a packed courtroom that it would result in Kroger "swallowing" Albertsons.
"Stopping this multibillion-dollar deal will keep in place the vigorous competition that acts as a check on rising grocery prices and spurs improvements in quality and innovation," she said.
Kroger attorney Matthew Wolf said in an opening statement that the merger would immediately lower some prices for shoppers at Albertsons, where prices are now 10-12% higher than at Kroger stores.
The FTC's bid to bring down prices by blocking the deal shows "they neither understand the industry nor the parties within it," Wolf said.
The merger is necessary, said Wolf, in order for the stores to competewith WalmartWMT.N, the largest grocery retailer in the U.S., bulk shopping mainstay Costco COST.O and Amazon.com AMZN.O, which owns Whole Foods.
Albertsons' lawyer Enu Mainigi said that Walmart is able to sell certain products at a price lower than the grocery store chain can buy them wholesale, and that a tie-up with Kroger gives Albertsons the best chance to survive.
"It could mean layoffs. It could include closing stores. It may include exiting certain markets altogether. These are the kind of things that are on the table if the merger does not go through," she said.
The case is a high-profile piece of the Biden administration's push to lower prices for consumers, and comes as high grocery bills take prominence in the U.S. presidential race.
It is also a key test of FTC Chair Lina Khan's initiative to use antitrust law to boost wages and mobility for workers.
Kroger attorney Wolf said there is no difference between union wages at Kroger stores that are located near Albertsons stores and those that are not.
The FTC's Musser said unionized grocery workers secure better pay and benefits by striking at one store and sending customers to a rival. A merger between Kroger and Albertsons would lessen the severity of that threat, she said.
The FTC alleges the merger would harm workers in dozens of labor markets.
"We don't believe the company's promise that they are doing this for competition," said Kim Cordova, president of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union local in Colorado and Wyoming.
The trial is expected to last around three weeks and feature evidence about competition in the grocery industry.
Kroger and Albertsons say the lawsuit's focus on traditional supermarkets ignores that consumers typically shop for food at a variety of locations including big-box stores like Target TGT.N and dollar stores such as Dollar Tree DLTR.O.
Kroger has said it will sell 579 of the approximately 5,000 stores it would own if the deal goes through. Part of the trial will focus on whether buyer C&S Wholesale Grocers can successfully run them.
Kroger has also pledged to lower grocery prices by $1 billion after the merger.
Retailers use multiple levers to lower prices, including negotiating better deals with suppliers, investing in automation in the supply chain or changing the way they label and package products.
Although Kroger declined to provide specifics, a source familiar with the matter indicated that the reductions will likely focus on essential and high-demand items first.
Musser said the investment represents only 0.5% of Kroger and Albertsons' combined total revenue.
Nelson is considering whether to pause the deal while an FTC in-house judge examines how it would impact competition.
Such reviews can take years, and companies often abandon paused deals rather than complete the process.
Arizona, California, Illinois, Maryland, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Wyoming and the District of Columbia have sued alongside the FTC.
Washington and Colorado have filed their own lawsuits to block the merger, which are scheduled to go to trial after the FTC's case.
Kroger case tests FTC Chair Khan's bid to protect workers ID:nL1N3KA0OO
Reporting by Jody Godoy and Siddharth Cavale in New York, and Deborah Bloom in Portland, Oregon; Editing by Matthew Lewis
Aset Terkait
Berita Terbaru
Pengungkapan: Entitas XM Group menyediakan layanan khusus eksekusi dan akses ke Fasilitas Trading Online kami, yang memungkinkan Anda untuk melihat dan/atau menggunakan konten yang tersedia pada atau melalui situs, yang tidak untuk mengubah atau memperluas, serta tidak mengubah atau memperluas hal tersebut. Akses dan penggunaan ini selalu sesuai dengan: (i) Syarat dan Ketentuan; (ii) Peringatan Risiko; dan (iii) Pengungkapan Penuh. Oleh karena itu, konten disediakan hanya sebagai informasi umum. Anda juga harus ketahui bahwa konten Fasilitas Trading Online kami bukan sebagai ajakan atau tawaran untuk untuk melakukan transaksi apa pun di pasar finansial. Trading di pasar finansial mana pun melibatkan tingkat risiko yang signifikan pada modal Anda.
Semua materi yang diterbitkan di Fasilitas Trading Online kami hanya untuk tujuan edukasi/informasi dan tidak boleh mengandung nasihat dan rekomendasi finansial, pajak investasi atau trading, catatan harga trading kami, penawaran, permintaan, transaksi dalam instrumen finansial apa pun atau promo finansial untuk Anda yang tidak diminta.
Konten pihak ketiga apa pun, serta konten yang disiapkan oleh XM, seperti opini, berita, riset, analisis, harga, informasi lain atau link ke situs pihak ketiga yang tersedia "sebagaimana adanya", sebagai komentar pasar umum dan bukan menjadi nasihat investasi. Sejauh konten apa pun ditafsirkan sebagai penelitian investasi, Anda harus memperhatikan dan menerima bahwa konten tersebut tidak dimaksudkan dan belum disiapkan sesuai dengan persyaratan hukum yang dirancang untuk mempromosikan kemandirian riset investasi dan dengan demikian akan dianggap sebagai komunikasi pemasaran di bawah hukum dan peraturan yang relevan. Mohon dipastikan bahwa Anda telah membaca dan memahami Notifikasi pada Riset Investasi Non-Independen dan Peringatan Risiko kami mengenai informasi di atas, yang dapat diakses disini.
