Tesla faces sanctions bid in California wrongful death lawsuit
By Mike Scarcella
Oct 28 (Reuters) -The estate of a man who was killed in 2021 after his Tesla crashed and caught fire has asked a federal judge in San Francisco to sanction the electric vehicle maker over stalled efforts to settle a wrongful death lawsuit.
Lawyers for the estate of Charles Leach said in a court filing on Friday night that Tesla violated a court order by failing to send a company official with settlement authority to a mediation hearing last month.
The estate's lawyers said they reached a deal to resolve the wrongful death lawsuit for a confidential amount, but they learned hours into the September hearing that Tesla’s designee, a products liability lawyer, could not approve a settlement agreement on his own.
Tesla's actions caused the parties to breach the settlement agreement, the lawyers said. The estate asked the court to award $9,600 in legal fees as a sanction against the Elon Musk-owned carmarker.
Tesla and its attorneys did not immediately respond to requests for comment, and neither did lawyers for the driver’s estate.
Tesla has denied any wrongdoing, blaming the driver for the fatal crash. A jury trial in the case is scheduled for July 2025.
The estate's lawsuit said Leach’s Tesla Model Y “suddenly” accelerated, went off the road and slammed into a pillar at an Ohio gas station. Leach, 72, died from blunt force trauma, burns and other injuries.
“Tesla was aware that its vehicles — including the Model Y — have reportedly on hundreds of occasions accelerated suddenly and without explanation,” the lawsuit said.
Tesla has responded that Leach was solely to blame for “improper and unsafe” operation of his 2021 vehicle. The company said Leach’s model “was state-of-the-art and was not defective in design or manufacture.”
Tesla has faced other lawsuits over crashes blamed on alleged defects in its electric vehicles. Tesla last year won the first trial over claims that its Autopilot driver assistant feature led to a death.
Tesla separately faces U.S. legal and regulatory scrutiny over its driver assistance systems. In December, Tesla recalled millions of vehicles to install new safeguards.
The case is Donna Leach v Tesla, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 3:23-cv-03378-SI.
For plaintiff: Todd Walburg and Scott Baez of McCune Law Group
For defendant: Sandra Ezell of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough
Read more:
US probes Tesla's Full Self-Driving software in 2.4 mln cars after fatal crash
Exclusive - Tesla Autopilot probe, US prosecutors focus on securities, wire fraud
Tesla settles case over fatal Autopilot crash of Apple engineer
Elon Musk defeats bid to be questioned in Tesla fatal crash lawsuit
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Aset Terkait
Berita Terbaru
Pengungkapan: Entitas XM Group menyediakan layanan khusus eksekusi dan akses ke Fasilitas Trading Online kami, yang memungkinkan Anda untuk melihat dan/atau menggunakan konten yang tersedia pada atau melalui situs, yang tidak untuk mengubah atau memperluas, serta tidak mengubah atau memperluas hal tersebut. Akses dan penggunaan ini selalu sesuai dengan: (i) Syarat dan Ketentuan; (ii) Peringatan Risiko; dan (iii) Pengungkapan Penuh. Oleh karena itu, konten disediakan hanya sebagai informasi umum. Anda juga harus ketahui bahwa konten Fasilitas Trading Online kami bukan sebagai ajakan atau tawaran untuk untuk melakukan transaksi apa pun di pasar finansial. Trading di pasar finansial mana pun melibatkan tingkat risiko yang signifikan pada modal Anda.
Semua materi yang diterbitkan di Fasilitas Trading Online kami hanya untuk tujuan edukasi/informasi dan tidak boleh mengandung nasihat dan rekomendasi finansial, pajak investasi atau trading, catatan harga trading kami, penawaran, permintaan, transaksi dalam instrumen finansial apa pun atau promo finansial untuk Anda yang tidak diminta.
Konten pihak ketiga apa pun, serta konten yang disiapkan oleh XM, seperti opini, berita, riset, analisis, harga, informasi lain atau link ke situs pihak ketiga yang tersedia "sebagaimana adanya", sebagai komentar pasar umum dan bukan menjadi nasihat investasi. Sejauh konten apa pun ditafsirkan sebagai penelitian investasi, Anda harus memperhatikan dan menerima bahwa konten tersebut tidak dimaksudkan dan belum disiapkan sesuai dengan persyaratan hukum yang dirancang untuk mempromosikan kemandirian riset investasi dan dengan demikian akan dianggap sebagai komunikasi pemasaran di bawah hukum dan peraturan yang relevan. Mohon dipastikan bahwa Anda telah membaca dan memahami Notifikasi pada Riset Investasi Non-Independen dan Peringatan Risiko kami mengenai informasi di atas, yang dapat diakses disini.
