Amazon slams authors’ class action over audiobook distribution
By Mike Scarcella
Sept 17 (Reuters) -Amazon.com has asked a U.S. judge to dismiss what it called a “far-fetched” lawsuit by independent authors accusing the e-commerce giant of monopolizing the retail market for audiobooks and causing them to overpay for the distribution of their works.
In a filing in Manhattan federal court, Amazon on Monday night defended the 90-day exclusivity provision that its digital audiobook subsidiary Audible offers to self-published authors.
Amazon also said the market for audiobooks was competitive, with Apple and Google offering rival platforms.
Author Christine DeMaio, who publishes under the name CD Reiss, alleged in her June lawsuit that Amazon violates U.S. antitrust law by charging higher fees for writers who decline to participate in Audible’s exclusivity program.
Amazon and lawyers for Reiss did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Tuesday.
Amazon bought Audible for about $300 million in 2008. The lawsuit called Audible the world’s largest audiobook retailer, accounting for more than 60% of domestic purchasing compared with about 20% for Apple.
Industry-wide sales of audiobooks have steadily risen in recent years, reaching nearly $2 billion in 2022, according to the lawsuit.
Amazon’s exclusivity program offers self-published authors 40% royalties for the distribution of their work, compared with 25% for authors who chose non-exclusive, competitive distribution.
Amazon’s filing said its optional exclusivity provisions, which do not apply to top-sellers from major publishers, are “limited in both duration and share of affected audiobook sales.” It said the program’s 90-day window is shorter than the 1-to-3 year range that courts use to determine competitive harm from an exclusivity arrangement.
“The complaint alleges no facts showing that Audible has somehow hobbled Google or any other identified rival by inducing some self-published authors to sign exclusive deals,” Amazon’s filing said.
Switching from exclusive to general distribution is permanent, Reiss’ lawsuit said. Reiss said Audible’s policy “is designed to prevent experimentation, innovation, and a test of competition by discouraging authors from ever distributing on a competitive basis.”
Amazon also said it was lawful for the company to spend more resources promoting its exclusive content than on other titles.
Reiss is seeking class-action status for thousands of authors and rights holders.
The case is CD Reiss v. Amazon.com, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. 2:24-cv-00851.
For plaintiff: Steve Berman of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro and Phillip Cramer of Sperling & Slater
For defendant: Carrie Mahan, Benjamin Mundel and Randi Singer of Sidley Austin
Read more:
Amazon accused of audiobook monopoly in author class action
Amazon defeats US consumers' class action over Whole Foods delivery fees
FTC lawsuit over Amazon's Prime program set for June 2025 trial
Amazon fends off US class action over 'guaranteed' delivery window
Aset Terkait
Berita Terbaru
Pengungkapan: Entitas XM Group menyediakan layanan khusus eksekusi dan akses ke Fasilitas Trading Online kami, yang memungkinkan Anda untuk melihat dan/atau menggunakan konten yang tersedia pada atau melalui situs, yang tidak untuk mengubah atau memperluas, serta tidak mengubah atau memperluas hal tersebut. Akses dan penggunaan ini selalu sesuai dengan: (i) Syarat dan Ketentuan; (ii) Peringatan Risiko; dan (iii) Pengungkapan Penuh. Oleh karena itu, konten disediakan hanya sebagai informasi umum. Anda juga harus ketahui bahwa konten Fasilitas Trading Online kami bukan sebagai ajakan atau tawaran untuk untuk melakukan transaksi apa pun di pasar finansial. Trading di pasar finansial mana pun melibatkan tingkat risiko yang signifikan pada modal Anda.
Semua materi yang diterbitkan di Fasilitas Trading Online kami hanya untuk tujuan edukasi/informasi dan tidak boleh mengandung nasihat dan rekomendasi finansial, pajak investasi atau trading, catatan harga trading kami, penawaran, permintaan, transaksi dalam instrumen finansial apa pun atau promo finansial untuk Anda yang tidak diminta.
Konten pihak ketiga apa pun, serta konten yang disiapkan oleh XM, seperti opini, berita, riset, analisis, harga, informasi lain atau link ke situs pihak ketiga yang tersedia "sebagaimana adanya", sebagai komentar pasar umum dan bukan menjadi nasihat investasi. Sejauh konten apa pun ditafsirkan sebagai penelitian investasi, Anda harus memperhatikan dan menerima bahwa konten tersebut tidak dimaksudkan dan belum disiapkan sesuai dengan persyaratan hukum yang dirancang untuk mempromosikan kemandirian riset investasi dan dengan demikian akan dianggap sebagai komunikasi pemasaran di bawah hukum dan peraturan yang relevan. Mohon dipastikan bahwa Anda telah membaca dan memahami Notifikasi pada Riset Investasi Non-Independen dan Peringatan Risiko kami mengenai informasi di atas, yang dapat diakses disini.
