Major book publishers defeat Internet Archive appeal over digital scanning
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK, Sept 4 (Reuters) -A U.S. appeals court sided with four major book publishers that accused the nonprofit Internet Archive of illegally scanning copyrighted works and lending them to the public online for free and without permission.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan agreed with Hachette Book Group LAGA.PA, HarperCollins Publishers NWSA.O, John Wiley & Sons WLY.N and Penguin Random House BTGGg.F that the archive's "large scale" copying and distribution of entire books did not amount to "fair use."
Publishers accused the nonprofit of infringing copyrights in 127 books from authors like Malcolm Gladwell, C.S. Lewis, Toni Morrison, J.D. Salinger and Elie Wiesel, by making the books freely available through its Free Digital Library.
The archive, which hosts more than 3.2 million copies of copyrighted books on its website, contended that the library was transformative because it made lending more convenient and served the public interest by promoting "access to knowledge."
But in a 59-page decision on Wednesday, Circuit Judge Beth Robinson said the archive merely supplanted the original books rather than transform them into "something new."
She said making books available for free harmed publishers and would "undoubtedly negatively impact the public," by taking away the incentive for many consumers and libraries to pay for books and for many authors to produce new works.
Robinson quoted a declaration from Sandra Cisneros, who wrote the best-selling novel "The House on Mango Street," that finding her works available for free online "was like I had gone to a pawn shop and seen my stolen possessions on sale."
The Internet Archive was appealing a March 2023 ruling from U.S. District Judge John Koeltl in Manhattan.
"We are reviewing the court's opinion and will continue to defend the rights of libraries to own, lend and preserve books," said Chris Freeland, the archive's director of library services.
Maria Pallante, president of the Association of American Publishers, said the decision "reinforced the indispensable role of authors and publishers in society" and was a major victory for authors, publishers and readers.
The Internet Archive limits lending from its Free Digital Library to one "checkout" for each physical book in storage.
It temporarily expanded lending in 2020, allowing checkouts by up to 10,000 users at a time, when the COVID-19 pandemic caused mass closures of schools, libraries and bookstores.
The expansion ended on June 16, 2020, two weeks after the publishers sued.
The case is Hachette Book Group Inc et al v. Internet Archive, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 23-1260.
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Leslie Adler
Aset Terkait
Berita Terbaru
Pengungkapan: Entitas XM Group menyediakan layanan khusus eksekusi dan akses ke Fasilitas Trading Online kami, yang memungkinkan Anda untuk melihat dan/atau menggunakan konten yang tersedia pada atau melalui situs, yang tidak untuk mengubah atau memperluas, serta tidak mengubah atau memperluas hal tersebut. Akses dan penggunaan ini selalu sesuai dengan: (i) Syarat dan Ketentuan; (ii) Peringatan Risiko; dan (iii) Pengungkapan Penuh. Oleh karena itu, konten disediakan hanya sebagai informasi umum. Anda juga harus ketahui bahwa konten Fasilitas Trading Online kami bukan sebagai ajakan atau tawaran untuk untuk melakukan transaksi apa pun di pasar finansial. Trading di pasar finansial mana pun melibatkan tingkat risiko yang signifikan pada modal Anda.
Semua materi yang diterbitkan di Fasilitas Trading Online kami hanya untuk tujuan edukasi/informasi dan tidak boleh mengandung nasihat dan rekomendasi finansial, pajak investasi atau trading, catatan harga trading kami, penawaran, permintaan, transaksi dalam instrumen finansial apa pun atau promo finansial untuk Anda yang tidak diminta.
Konten pihak ketiga apa pun, serta konten yang disiapkan oleh XM, seperti opini, berita, riset, analisis, harga, informasi lain atau link ke situs pihak ketiga yang tersedia "sebagaimana adanya", sebagai komentar pasar umum dan bukan menjadi nasihat investasi. Sejauh konten apa pun ditafsirkan sebagai penelitian investasi, Anda harus memperhatikan dan menerima bahwa konten tersebut tidak dimaksudkan dan belum disiapkan sesuai dengan persyaratan hukum yang dirancang untuk mempromosikan kemandirian riset investasi dan dengan demikian akan dianggap sebagai komunikasi pemasaran di bawah hukum dan peraturan yang relevan. Mohon dipastikan bahwa Anda telah membaca dan memahami Notifikasi pada Riset Investasi Non-Independen dan Peringatan Risiko kami mengenai informasi di atas, yang dapat diakses disini.
