Some US Steel appeal would survive busted deal
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Jonathan Guilford
NEW YORK, Sept 12 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Insufficient heat can interrupt the welding process, but U.S. Steel’s X.N problem has been too much of it. Fiery nationalistic and labor backlash is preventing the 123-year-old company from fusing with Japanese peer Nippon Steel 5401.T, as leery U.S. security regulators look set to nix the $15 billion deal. Although boss David Burritt may be forced to mold his metal-maker differently, there are ways to keep it relatively strong.
The fight over U.S. Steel offers a microcosm of an industry-wide one. More carbon-intensive blast furnaces produce steel of better quality. And even though, say, the smooth surfaces of car panels are tougher for newer electric arc furnaces, they’re catching up – and with better economics. At less than 10%, anticipated full-year EBITDA margins for U.S. Steel and blast-furnace rival Cleveland-Cliffs CLF.N lag the 15% at more advanced Nucor NUE.N and Steel Dynamics STLD.O, according to Visible Alpha.
Electric now accounts for 68% of U.S. production, the World Steel Association says. U.S. Steel chased this shift, acquiring Big River Steel a few years ago, before plowing $3.4 billion into an expansion project dubbed BR2.
The problem: the investment incinerated free cash flow. U.S. Steel is expected to burn through more than $700 million of it this year, Visible Alpha estimates show. Steel prices surged through the pandemic, but they’ve receded again. Expectations for the company’s blast-furnace-segment EBITDA for 2024 have tumbled 35% since February. Some facilities sit idle, others need costly overhauls.
Small wonder that Burritt accepted Nippon’s $55-a-share offer in December. The price exceeds the mid-$20s where it formerly languished. It also hands over responsibility for a difficult strategic transition and a strained relationship with the United Steelworkers union representing blast-furnace employees. Non-union Big River ate up the capital once earmarked for unionized mills.
Nippon is making last-ditch efforts to salvage the transaction from being rejected by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, which screens inbound takeovers. If it can’t, however, all is not lost for Burritt.
U.S. Steel’s metamorphosis holds immense promise despite likely job losses and other downsides from a deal collapse. Its electric business already produces superior margins to the rest of the company. Put the unit’s expected 2025 EBITDA on Nucor’s multiple of around 7 times and the rest on the 5 times at which Cleveland-Cliffs trades, and U.S. Steel is worth nearly $11 billion, including debt. It’s less than Nippon is willing to pay for control, but it’s also 11% higher than where it’s valued now. Big River also offers additional upside, an indication of fresh ways to strike when the iron is hot.
Follow @JMAGuilford on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Nippon Steel Vice Chair Takahiro Mori was due to meet on Sept. 11 with U.S. officials from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to push for approval of the company’s agreed acquisition of U.S. Steel, the Financial Times reported, citing unnamed sources.
U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration is moving toward blocking the deal, Reuters reported on Sept. 4, also citing unnamed sources. The combination, unveiled on Dec. 18, 2023, values U.S. Steel at $55 a share.
Lourenco Goncalves, the chief executive of U.S. steelmaking rival Cleveland-Cliffs, preemptively congratulated the administration on Sept. 5 for intervening, adding that his company “stands ready” to buy any union-represented assets that U.S. Steel may shut down. U.S. Steel CEO David Burritt has said his company may have to close mills and move its headquarters if the Nippon Steel deal falls through.
Graphic: US steel prices have given up their Covid-19 booster https://reut.rs/4gm3qIG
Graphic: US Steel's capital spending has shifted dramatically https://reut.rs/3AVCaR6
Editing by Jeffrey Goldfarb and Sharon Lam
Aset Terkait
Berita Terbaru
Pengungkapan: Entitas XM Group menyediakan layanan khusus eksekusi dan akses ke Fasilitas Trading Online kami, yang memungkinkan Anda untuk melihat dan/atau menggunakan konten yang tersedia pada atau melalui situs, yang tidak untuk mengubah atau memperluas, serta tidak mengubah atau memperluas hal tersebut. Akses dan penggunaan ini selalu sesuai dengan: (i) Syarat dan Ketentuan; (ii) Peringatan Risiko; dan (iii) Pengungkapan Penuh. Oleh karena itu, konten disediakan hanya sebagai informasi umum. Anda juga harus ketahui bahwa konten Fasilitas Trading Online kami bukan sebagai ajakan atau tawaran untuk untuk melakukan transaksi apa pun di pasar finansial. Trading di pasar finansial mana pun melibatkan tingkat risiko yang signifikan pada modal Anda.
Semua materi yang diterbitkan di Fasilitas Trading Online kami hanya untuk tujuan edukasi/informasi dan tidak boleh mengandung nasihat dan rekomendasi finansial, pajak investasi atau trading, catatan harga trading kami, penawaran, permintaan, transaksi dalam instrumen finansial apa pun atau promo finansial untuk Anda yang tidak diminta.
Konten pihak ketiga apa pun, serta konten yang disiapkan oleh XM, seperti opini, berita, riset, analisis, harga, informasi lain atau link ke situs pihak ketiga yang tersedia "sebagaimana adanya", sebagai komentar pasar umum dan bukan menjadi nasihat investasi. Sejauh konten apa pun ditafsirkan sebagai penelitian investasi, Anda harus memperhatikan dan menerima bahwa konten tersebut tidak dimaksudkan dan belum disiapkan sesuai dengan persyaratan hukum yang dirancang untuk mempromosikan kemandirian riset investasi dan dengan demikian akan dianggap sebagai komunikasi pemasaran di bawah hukum dan peraturan yang relevan. Mohon dipastikan bahwa Anda telah membaca dan memahami Notifikasi pada Riset Investasi Non-Independen dan Peringatan Risiko kami mengenai informasi di atas, yang dapat diakses disini.
